एस.आर. बोम्मई विरुद्ध भारत सरकार या खटल्यातील सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाच्या निर्णयासंबंधात खालील विधाने विचारात घ्या :
(a) न्यायालयाने सांगितले की, राष्ट्रपतीने संसदेने मान्यता दिल्यानंतरच राज्य विधानसभा विसर्जित करावी.
(b) जर संसदेने घोषणेला मान्यता दिली नाही तर विधानसभा पुनर्जीवित करण्यात यावी.
(c) राष्ट्रपती राजवट लागू करण्याच्या समर्थनार्थ योग्य ती सुसंबद्ध कारणे आहेत, ती सिद्ध करण्याची जबाबदारी केन्द्राची आहे.
वरीलपैकी कोणते विधान/ने बरोबर आहे/त ?

The correct answer is Option D (All of the above).

Key Points:
• S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) Landmark Judgment:
• In this historic 9-judge bench decision, the Supreme Court laid down detailed guidelines regarding the proclamation of President's Rule under Article 356:
• 1. Suspension vs. Dissolution: The President can only suspend the Legislative Assembly upon issuing the proclamation; the Assembly can be dissolved only after both Houses of Parliament have approved the proclamation Statement (a) is correct.
• 2. Reactivation: If Parliament does not approve the proclamation within two months, or if it is struck down by the Court, the dismissed government and the dissolved assembly can be revived/reactivated Statement (b) is correct.
• 3. Burden of Proof: The proclamation is subject to judicial review, and the burden lies on the Union Government to prove that relevant and material evidence existed to justify the breakdown of constitutional machinery Statement (c) is correct.
• Hence, all statements are correct.
• Key Takeaway: Bommai (1994) ruled that State Assemblies cannot be dissolved before parliamentary approval, and assemblies can be revived if unapproved.