प्रतिपादन (A): मार्गदर्शक तत्त्वांची अंमलबजावणी न झाल्यास न्यायालयाकडे दाद मागता येत नाही.
कारण (R) : देशाच्या शासनकारभारात मार्गदर्शक तत्त्वे ही मूलभूत आहेत.

The correct answer is Option B (Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.).

Key Points:
• Article 37 Provisions: Article 37 explicitly states two distinct principles: (1) Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs) are non-justiciable / non-enforceable in any court of law, and (2) nevertheless, these principles are fundamental in the governance of the country, and it shall be the duty of the State to apply them in making laws.
• Evaluation of Statements: Assertion (A) is factually correct because an individual cannot seek a writ or court order to enforce DPSPs. Reason (R) is also a direct constitutional fact stated in Article 37.
• Relationship Between Statements: Reason (R) does not explain *why* they are unenforceable. They were made non-enforceable due to the newly independent nation's financial, infrastructural, and administrative limitations in 1950, not because they are fundamental to governance.
• Key Result: Both statements are true independently, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
• Key Takeaway: Under Article 37, DPSPs are non-justiciable yet fundamental in the governance of the country.