खालील विधाने वाचून अचूक पर्याय निवडा.
(a) प्राधिकार काढण्याचे सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाचे अधिकार केवळ मूलभूत अधिकारांच्या हननासंबंधीच्या खटल्यांपुरते मर्यादित आहेत मात्र उच्च न्यायालयाकडे कोणत्याही अधिकाराचे हनन झाल्यास प्राधिकार काढण्याचे व्यापक अधिकार आहेत.
(b) देहोपस्थितींचा प्राधिकार सर्वोच्च न्यायालय केवळ शासनाला उद्देशून काढू तर उच्च न्यायालय असा आदेश व्यक्तीला उद्देशूनही काढू शकते.
पर्यायी उत्तरे :

The correct answer is Option A (Statement (a) is true but (b) is false).

Key Points:
• Writ Jurisdiction Scope (Statement a): Under Article 32, the Supreme Court can issue writs *only* for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights, whereas under Article 226, High Courts can issue writs for Fundamental Rights *as well as* for 'any other purpose' (making High Court writ jurisdiction wider). Statement (a) is true.
• Habeas Corpus Scope (Statement b): The writ of Habeas Corpus (to secure the release of a person unlawfully detained) can be issued against both public authorities/State *and* private individuals by both the Supreme Court and High Courts. Thus, stating that only High Courts can issue it against private individuals makes statement (b) false.
• Conclusion: Statement (a) is true, but statement (b) is false.
• Key Takeaway: High Courts have a wider writ scope than the Supreme Court; however, Habeas Corpus can be issued against private individuals by both courts.