भारतातील सर्वोच्च न्यायालय आणि उच्च न्यायालये यांच्या आदेशाच्या अधिकार क्षेत्रासंदर्भात खालीलपैकी कोणते विधान बरोबर आहे ?

The correct answer is Option D (High Courts can issue writs not only for the purpose of inforcement of Fundamental Rights but also for any other purpose, whereas the Supreme Court will issue writs only for the purpose of Inforcement of Fundamental Rights.).

Key Points:
• Comparison of Writ Jurisdictions (Article 32 vs Article 226):
• Article 32 (Supreme Court): The Supreme Court can issue writs (Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Quo-Warranto, Certiorari) ONLY for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights guaranteed in Part III.
• Article 226 (High Courts): The writ jurisdiction of the High Court is broader because it can issue writs not only for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights but also "for any other purpose" (i.e., for enforcement of ordinary legal rights).
• Territorial Scope: Supreme Court's writ runs throughout India, whereas High Court's writ runs within its territorial jurisdiction (or outside if the cause of action arises within its jurisdiction).
• Remedy status: Article 32 is itself a Fundamental Right, whereas Article 226 is a discretionary constitutional remedy.
• Statement (4) accurately highlights this constitutional distinction.
• Key Takeaway: High Courts (Art 226) can issue writs for fundamental rights and ordinary legal rights, whereas the Supreme Court (Art 32) issues writs only for fundamental rights.