खालीलपैकी कोणती विधाने सत्य आहेत ?
(a) भारत सरकार वि. महाराष्ट्र राज्य यामधील वादाची सुनावणी थेट सर्वोच्च न्यायालयच सुरु करु शकते.
(b) अनुच्छेद 226 द्वारा उच्च न्यायालयास परमादेश देण्याचे बाबतीत सर्वोच्च न्यायालयापेक्षा जास्त अधिकार आहेत.
(c) आयकर ट्रिब्युनल (न्यायसभा) विरुद्ध रीट याचिका दाखल करता येत नाही.
योग्य पर्याय निवडा :

The correct answer is Option B (Only (a) and (b) are true).

Key Points:
• The correct option is (2).
• Statement (a) is true: Under Article 131, the Supreme Court has Original and Exclusive Jurisdiction over federal disputes between the Government of India and one or more States (such as Union vs State of Maharashtra); no other court can entertain such disputes.
• Statement (b) is true: Under Article 226, the High Court's writ jurisdiction is broader than the Supreme Court's (Article 32) because the High Court can issue writs not only for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights but also 'for any other purpose' (legal rights).
• Statement (c) is false: Quasi-judicial tribunals like the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) are subject to the supervisory writ jurisdiction of High Courts under Articles 226 and 227 (certiorari and prohibition can be filed against them).
• Therefore, only statements (a) and (b) are true.
• Key Takeaway: Federal disputes fall exclusively under the Supreme Court's Article 131, and High Courts have broader writ jurisdiction under Article 226 than the Supreme Court under Article 32.