खालील विधाने विचारात घ्या -
(a) राज्यघटनेच्या भाग V मधील प्रकरण II हे राज्य विधिमंडळासंबंधित आहे.
(b) मिझोराम, अरुणाचल प्रदेश आणि उत्तराखंड राज्यांच्या विधानसभा सदस्यांची संख्या 60 पेक्षा कमी आहे.
(c) राज्यपालांना योग्य वाटतील तितके अँग्लो-इंडियन जमातीचे सदस्य विधान सभेत नामनिर्देशित करता येतात.
(d) अँग्लो-इंडियन्सच्या नामनिर्देशनाची तरतूद 2020 पर्यंत वाढविण्यात आलेली आहे.
वरीलपैकी कोणते विधान/ने बरोबर आहे/त ?

The correct answer is Option B ((d) only).

Key Points:
• Factual Analysis of Constitutional Articles:
• Statement (a) [printed as (b) in Marathi]: Arunachal Pradesh has 60 members and Uttarakhand has 70 members (neither has fewer than 60; only Goa, Mizoram, and Sikkim have fewer than 60) (Incorrect).
• Statement (b) [printed as (a) in Marathi]: Part VI Chapter III deals with State Legislature; Part V Chapter II deals with Parliament (Incorrect).
• Statement (c): Under Article 333, the Governor could nominate only ONE member of the Anglo-Indian community if not adequately represented, not "such number as he considers appropriate" (Incorrect).
• Statement (d): By the 95th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2009, the reservation and nomination for SCs, STs, and Anglo-Indians under Article 334 was extended up to 2020 (Correct).
• Hence, statement (d) only is correct (Option 2).
• Key Takeaway: The 95th Constitutional Amendment extended Anglo-Indian nomination up to 2020; under Article 333, the Governor could nominate only 1 member.