पुढील विधानांचे अवलोकन करा.
माहिती अधिकार अधिनियम 2005 नुसार.
विधान 1 : एखाद्या विशिष्ट सरकारी कर्मचाऱ्याने नियुक्तीसाठी केलेल्या अर्जाची प्रत नागरिक माहिती अधिकार कायद्यांतर्गत मागू शकतो.
विधान 2 : अशा विनंतीस या कारणास्तव नकार दिला जाऊ शकत नाही की यामध्ये काही वैयक्तिक गोष्टी आहेत ज्या उघड करणे आवश्यक ठरत नाहीत.
पर्यायी उत्तरे :
(1) Both the statements are incorrect.
(2) Both the statements are correct.
(3) Statement 1 is correct but statement 2 is not the answer to it.
(4) Statement 1 is incorrect but the statement 2 is correct.

The correct answer is Option B (Both the statements are correct.).

Key Points:
• RTI Act, 2005 - Personal Information and Public Servant Records:
• Statement 1 is correct: Information relating to public servants, including their employment application forms, qualifications submitted for appointment, and service particulars, constitutes public records accessible under the RTI Act, 2005 (subject to judicial rulings like *Girish Ramchandra Deshmukh v. CIC* where personal medical/private asset details have exemptions, but appointment application per se is accessible).
• Statement 2 is correct: CIC and High Court precedents have established that since employment in public service is a matter of public record and accountability, such requests cannot be summarily denied under Section 8(1)(j) on the blanket plea of 'unwarranted invasion of personal privacy' if public interest and transparency override it.
• As per the official MPSC key, Both the statements are correct (Option 2).
• Key Takeaway: Under the RTI Act 2005, a citizen can ask for a government employee's appointment application, and such requests cannot be denied solely on personal privacy grounds.